![]() ![]() > I didn't realize that was for a presentation. > We were talking by the water cooler and you had that great idea > and I told you to run with it and present it this week. > What presentation?! > The one I assigned you last week. This is useful when replying to or forwarding long discussions where each party has continued to quote the previous message, resulting in text like: > Just checking in on the status of your presentation for the meeting. Other minor quoting tweaks include the option to remove all quotes above the level (1 to 10) you choose. Rather keep the blank line, you have that option (in QuoteFix’s preferences, which are accessible via the Mail menu). I also like that QuoteFix removes the blank line between the attribution and quoted text, although if you’d QuoteFix even correctly places your signature below the cursor. First and foremost, whenever you reply to or forward a message, QuoteFix automatically places the attribution line ( On, at, wrote:) at the top, followed by the quoted text, with the cursor waiting for you at the bottom. How the project could be “more clear” if people can’t be expected to read it is beyond my pay grade.This flaw can be fixed using QuoteFix, a plug-in for Mail that offers a number of message-quoting fixes. Honest-to-$deity, the incredibly common counter argument is that members - who voluntarily signed up for self-improvement purposes - not only don’t read that part, but that they shouldn’t be expected to read the project before undertaking it. There are definitely opportunities to clarify, but I (and a number of others) pointed out that the project requirements are very clearly spelled out on a page called “Your Assignment”, and that perhaps members should be coached to pay particular attention to that page. It’s significantly different than the old, so obviously there’s some confusion in transition.Īnyway, there’s a project that confuses many people, along with a “Toastmasters needs to be more clear” complaint. I’m part of a group called Toastmasters, and they recently released a new version of their self-paced curricula. “Just read the syllabus!” I silently scream. Though I try hard not to show it to the students, it is extraordinarily frustrating. I cannot tell you how often I have graduate students ask me a question about research projects that has already been addressed in my comprehensive syllabus. ![]() They also want to be able to give the boss the whole story in case he needs to become involved. #Quotefix mac archive#They typically want to ask for a specific person to do something without having to read the whole thread, but they include the whole thread so they can archive just the last message for documentation purposes. I typically see top posting without trimming from this group.Because most people read from top to bottom, the context of the request is usually fairly clear by the time you get to the request. #Quotefix mac software#They tend to use proper email clients or good forum software that makes it easy to keep track of the threads. I typically see bottom posting and trimming from this group.2) the people who work for companies where email is a primary form of communication, but they don’t care about email per se, they just want to get their work done and have a form of escalation to managers when needed. What is the MPU consensus about top posting vs bottom posting and trimming? In my observations there appear to be two main groups: 1) the people who use email or forums to communicate with peers on the internet about various topic, like us MPUs. It has been a while since I have seen a debate on top posting vs bottom posting. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |